30 June 2014
The Appellate Chamber of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, BiH, quashes a first instance verdict under which Goran Saric was sentenced to 14 years in prison for crimes in Nahorevo neighbourhood, Sarajevo.
27 May 2014
The Prosecution and Defence presented the Appellate Chamber of the Court of BiH with their appeals against a verdict pronounced in August 2013, under which Saric was sentenced to 14 years in prison for crimes in Nahorevo neighbourhood, Sarajevo.
20 March 2014
Acquitted war crime indictees are not satisfied with the amounts they are being offered for the time they spent behind bars.
24 June 2013
Former Serb police officer Goran Saric said he was innocent of war crimes in the Sarajevo settlement of Nahorevo in 1992 as the court announced it would deliver its verdict in August.
16 May 2013
The state must pay more than 380,000 Marks (190,000 Euros) to former war crimes indictees as compensation for the time they spent in custody before being acquitted by the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. However many of the former indictees are still unhappy.
8 September 2009
The Prosecution and the Defence of the indictees charged with genocide committed in Srebrenica call on the Court to overturn the first-instance verdict and order a retrial.
14 July 2008
Two Defence teams present their closing arguments at the first trial for the Srebrenica genocide, calling for a verdict of release for the former policemen.
28 May 2008
The Defence teams for 11 indictees accused of genocide in Kravica did not want to cross-examine Petar Mitrovic and Miladin Stevanovic.
27 June 2007
Lawyers representing 11 indictees charged with genocide have presented their proposed evidence plan.
10 January 2007
The trial of 11 indictees charged with genocide committed in Kravica has not continued as planned because the accused did not appear in court.
16 November 2006
Judgements handed down by the Hague tribunal may be adopted as evidence in genocide trial.
27 October 2006
The defence teams representing 11 accused of genocide have expressed dissatisfaction during presentation of the prosecution's evidence.
10 March 2006
Defence win bid to have proceedings delayed, amid indications that at least one defendant’s case could rest on proving his insanity.